jason12 Posted May 11, 2010 Author Report Posted May 11, 2010 Sweet, and I'm guessing any commo shocks would be better than the 55 ones as the commodore is a lot heavier (keeping in mind my ultra pov budget lol) Quote
LXY-642 Posted May 12, 2010 Report Posted May 12, 2010 i've been told with commodore sedan shocks are shorter then wagon shocks? i wouldn't have a clue myself, just maybe another option? Quote
towe001 Posted May 12, 2010 Report Posted May 12, 2010 Nope, miles longer then even the rolla sedan shocks Quote
azz Posted May 12, 2010 Report Posted May 12, 2010 (edited) Would these fit in a lowered 20? mine are shot and its time for some replacements. Anyone given it a go? Edited May 12, 2010 by azz Quote
Grand Master of Awesome Posted May 12, 2010 Report Posted May 12, 2010 Would these fit in a lowered 20? mine are shot and its time for some replacements.Anyone given it a go? Yeah mate ksev shock are near identicle to '55's :blinks: Well infact rear shocks are basically interchangable from ke10 though 20's, 30's, 55's , 70's, AE86's, T18's etc etc. So bare in mind you can also use say TRD short stroke adjustables for an AE86. Quote
project_KE55 Posted May 12, 2010 Report Posted May 12, 2010 I went into Autobarn on Sunday and i suprised the guy that works there, he didnt believe me that the VN shocks are the same as the KE30/55 rear shocks, so i told his to look them up and vwala identical part numbers. The only thing i can't understand is the price difference. Corolla rear shocks - $119.00 on sale this week only. Commodore shocks - $144.50 RRP Shouldnt they both be on sale as they have identical part numbers? You'd think the barcode would read the same? Anyway i'm confuzzled now If i owned a commonwhore, i'd be buying the corolla ones only cause i'm cheap :blinks: Cheers, Mark. Quote
LXY-642 Posted May 12, 2010 Report Posted May 12, 2010 you would think if the same part number comes up then would be the same price. and well sucks to be my mate that has a vl calais turbo wagon and fitted sedan rear suspension cause he was told it was lower lol. Quote
styler Posted May 13, 2010 Report Posted May 13, 2010 (edited) you have to be specific though with rear dampers... use part numbers and measurements rather than this wagon and that wagon fits... they can fit the mounts but not be the right: stroke / extended length / compressed length / valving to work properly or to work well - depending on how much your car is lowered... remember its a certain model of damper that usually fits many cars not the other way around, but it seems more common for people to use car models and years as its easier to remember - if they remember it correctly and if it is the same lowered height as the car they fitted it to, but unfortunately some manufacturers have stopped giving out measurements knowing you will use them for a different application than designated. i do have the following specs which are much more useful than car models and years, i just have to find where i have put them kyb: 343006: extended mm compressed mm stroke mm valving std/stiffer 343007 extended mm compressed mm stroke mm valving std/stiffer 343113 extended mm compressed mm stroke mm valving std/stiffer Edited May 13, 2010 by styler Quote
jason12 Posted May 13, 2010 Author Report Posted May 13, 2010 Put the shocks in today and they fit perfect. Just got std commo wagon shocks from the wrecker but it definitely made a difference, feels a lot stiffer now so I'm happy :blinks: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.