KE70MAN Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 hey wats the difference with 4-2-1 and 4-1 extractors? cheers Quote
Super Jamie Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 generally tri-y extractors are used on v8s, it's said that you get more torque out of them but they restrict top end. they're really just a compromise and a waste of time get 4-1s Quote
blown 5k Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 I fully disagree there Jamie,i recommend 4 into 2 into 1s. Quote
Super Jamie Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 david vizard also reckons 4-2-1s are shit, i'm sticking with him :) Quote
blown 5k Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 Good for you,bet he`s built lots of K series motors. Quote
Redwarf Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 4-2-1's on EVO1 work goodly. Pro's and con's for both. Quote
Super Jamie Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 no, but he's built lots of pushrod engines with wedge shaped combustion chambers, and lots of non crossflow engines, and he's been building motors longer than i've been alive, so yeah :) Quote
Ratty Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 i had 4-2-1 on my mini and it made good use of the 1100cc engine had a nice muffler too, dam i miss my old clubman sob Quote
Ratty Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 Found some old pics of the mini just had to scan them hope they come out right Quote
Ratty Posted July 13, 2005 Report Posted July 13, 2005 I know its off topic but it was a sweet little car my first love untill the rolla arrived hehe :) I still have a soft spot for the mini tho Quote
rjenman Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 At first thought I assumed 4-2-1 would be better because its a "smooth transition" but I have read a few sites, apparently 4into1 are better. Would be interested to hear someone explain the pros and cons. Quote
KE70MAN Posted July 14, 2005 Author Report Posted July 14, 2005 hey guess what!! no one has explained to me what each one means :) but what costs better, has better performance etc etc.. thanks Quote
blown 5k Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 4 into 2 into ones give better midrange with the sacrifice of some top end power 4 into 1s give less midrange and more peak seeing as how most people on here are into build road motors 4 into 2 into 1s are the way to go. The more radical an engine is in regaurds to camshaft timing the more critical and fussy they become in the exhaust,bigger diameter pipes move the torque peak up the rpm range smaller pipe diameters move it down changes in length of the pipes tends to "rock" the torque curve around the point of peak torque.If you have a mild cam and its for the road any decent set of extractors will be fine. Quote
Super Jamie Posted July 14, 2005 Report Posted July 14, 2005 i beg to differ, my cammed 4k made bucketloads of torque down low, i couldn't have wanted more, i could however have used more top end on a K motor, i think pipe diameter is more important than design, bigger primaries would have been awesome. ideally, you should get extractors custom made for the powerband of the engine Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.